Wiring connection for automobile-lights.



F. E. MULLIN. WIRING CONNECTION FOR AUTOMOBILE LIGHTS.

APPLICATION FILED JUNE 2.1911- 7 I 1,295,191 Patented Feb.1919.

6 I ,,,,,,,,,,,,p//////////// a 7 7 Inventor Witnesses by I r AttorneysFRANK E. MULLIN, 0F PENNANT, SASKATCHEWAN, CANADA.

'WIRIN CONNECTION FOR AUTOMOBILE-LIGHTS.

Specification of Letters Patent.

Patented Feb. 25, 1919.

Application filed June 2, 1917. Serial N 0. 172,475.

To all wiwm it may concern.-

Be it known that I, FRANK E. MULLIN, a subject of the Kin of England,residing rovince of Saskatchehe present invention relates to Wiringconnections for use in systems of Wiring for automobile lamps and forother purposes.

The main object of the invention is the means for connecting a numaconductor.

With the foregoing and other objects in view, which will appear as thedescription proceeds, the invention resides in the combination andarrangement of parts and in the details of construction hereinafterdescribed and claimed, it being understood that changes in the preciseembodiment of the invention herein disclosed can be made within thescope of what is claimed without departing from the spirit of theinvention.

The invention is illustrated in the accompanying drawing, wherein hefigure is a view in elevation of the device.

so that such terminals may In the, drawing the connection or bus bar 6is shown formed of wire doubled longitudinally and having spaced twistedportions With loops 7 therebetween and at the ends, one end loop 7having an extension or eye 8 for the connection of a conductor, notshown. The loops 7 are adapted to be slipped over binding posts or liketerminals be readily connected to-the conductor.

Having thus described the invention, What is claimed is A bus barembodying a doubled Wire having spaced loops to tit on binding posts,and twisted portions between said loops, the

wire having an extended eye at one end of the bar for the attachment ofa. conductor.

In testimony that I claim the foregoing as my own, I have hereto atlixedmy signature in the presence of two Witnesses.

FRANK E. MULLIN. Witnesses Ivy E. SIMPSON, PHILOMENA A. RocKeLLI.

